Visceral Games Closed Because Players Don’t Want Linear Games, EA Says
When Electronic Arts announced the closure of Dead Space studio Visceral Games, it realized the fears that linear, story-based experiences were becoming a declining focus in the gaming industry. This notion became increasingly evident when EA announced the former studio’s unfinished Star Wars game was undergoing a multiplayer-friendly overhaul. With the long-argued linear vs. multiplayer debate gaining new steam, EA has finally come forward with substantial reasoning for why Visceral Games closed.
EA Chief Financial Officer Blake Jorgensen revealed all in a recent investors presentation at the Credit Suisse 21st Annual Technology Conference. On the subject of Visceral Games, Jorgensen gave the reasoning that “people don’t like” linear games as they once did, referring to the studio’s closure as purely an “economic decision”. The publisher’s harsh conclusion was reportedly reached after finding they couldn’t possibly recoup development costs while sporting a singular experience.
As Jorgensen continued, he spoke of how Visceral significantly shrunk in size over the past six years, at one point falling as low as 80 employed developers. It was then when EA considered the studio sub-scale in relation to their other businesses, and offered support from EA Vancouver and Motive in Montréal in attempt to save development of the Star Wars game. Gameplay was reportedly supposed to push things “to the next level”, but it seems Visceral’s vision for the title was simply not meant to be.
What do you think? Was EA justified in shutting down a potential dud, or do you think Visceral Games closed for more sinister reasons? Let us know in the comments below and be sure to follow Don’t Feed the Gamers on Twitter to be informed of the latest and entertainment news 24 hours a day! For more EA news from recent weeks, check out these next few stories:
- EA Email Leak Reveals Delicate Details Regarding Upcoming Co-Op Adventure
- New Titanfall 2 Update Brings Elite Weapon Warpaints And More
- EA “Not Giving Up” On Battlefront 2 Microtransactions – Doesn’t Think Players Want A Pink Vader
Source :
Eric Hall2391 Posts
Phone-browsing Wikipedia in one hand and clutching his trusty controller in the other, the legendary Eric Hall spreads his wealth of knowledge as a writer for Don't Feed the Gamers. Be sure to catch his "Throwback Thursday" segment for a nostalgic look at trivia from the past.
4 Comments
Latest Report From Superdata Suggests Single Player Games "Still Have Legs"
December 4, 2017 at 12:14 AM[…] multiplayer titles with exploitable microtransaction potential. A perfect example of this is the Visceral Games studio. EA shuttered its developer studio and re-purposed the Star Wars title being developed, […]
Obsidian Promises Their Huge New RPG Will Have Zero Microtransactions
December 17, 2017 at 12:22 PM[…] up about their stance on a hot topic right now in the gaming community: microtransactions. With EA effectively declaring war on linear, single-player games – and more publishers coming forward in support of the rising […]
CD Projekt RED Doesn't Shy Away From Getting Real About Loot Boxes
February 18, 2018 at 11:47 PM[…] regarding microtransactions started to bleed into other projects. Most notably, their statement that players “don’t want” single-player, narrative driven games which ultimately led to the abrupt closure of Visceral and […]
Open-World Star Wars Title In The Works With EA
March 25, 2018 at 12:00 AM[…] year, Visceral Studio was closed down and the Star Wars RPG game they were working on was transferred over to EA […]